City Growth Can Be 'A Force for Good'
From the Archives
Posted on September 20, 2007
|
| Urbanization is inevitable, but it can also be positive. Photo Credit: Shirine Bakhat/Mercy Corps |
The report notes that 2030's expected urban population will be nearly 5 billion. By contrast, the total human population this year -- both urban and rural -- is around 6 billion.
The future of cities in developing countries -- and the future of humanity itself -- "depend very much on the decisions made now in preparation for this growth," George Martine, the principle author of the report, said at its release last week.
Urbanization is inevitable but it can also be positive, he added.
|
From an environmental standpoint, concentrating the world's population minimizes human encroachment on natural habitats.
|
A key misconception to be dispelled, according to the report, is that urbanization is inherently bad for people and the planet. Images of city slums, poverty, and environmental degradation can easily lead people to judge city growth negatively, but according to Martine, "urbanization can and should be a force for good."
There are many economic, social, and environmental advantages to concentrating people and the services and jobs they need in close proximity to one another. The higher intensity of economic activity in cities favors jobs and income. In addition to this, proximity and concentration allow for governments to more effectively and inexpensively provide social services, infrastructure, and amenities to their citizens, the report explains.
And from an environmental standpoint, concentrating the world's population minimizes human encroachment on natural habitats.
The Worldwatch Institute's Christopher Flavin sees cities as powerful drivers behind efforts to combat climate change. As national governments and the international community have lagged on many environmental initiatives, he said recently, cities are stepping in to put in place "concrete policies and plans that address climate issues."
Cities like Rizhao, China; Bogotá, Colombia; Chicago; and New York are among the many implementing environmentally friendly building, car, and energy strategies, according to Flavin's group. And this, he said, is becoming an important national and international political force placing pressure on governments worldwide to step up.
Flavin spoke at the Washington, DC release of the 108-page report, which is the annual flagship analysis produced by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA).
|
The world's cities are places of hope. The possibilities are there, and that is what we should focus on for the future.
|
This is good news, says UNFPA, because smaller cities usually have greater flexibility to expand, ability to attract investments, and decision-making autonomy.
The bad news, however, is that smaller cities generally have more unaddressed issues and may have problems with housing, drinking water, sanitation, waste disposal, and other public services.
UNFPA's report is hopeful that, once political leaders better understand these characteristics of urbanization, its benefits can be maximized and negative consequences reduced.
U.S. Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) is also optimistic. "The world's cities are places of hope," she said last week. "The possibilities are there, and that is what we should focus on for the future."
In cities, vast inequalities remain, Maloney said, citing particularly the area of reproductive health. "There are huge gaps in access between the wealthy and the poor, and we must reverse this trend."
Improving access to reproductive health would help slow the growth of cities, the UN report says, adding that "natural increase" -- the difference between births and deaths -- is the main cause of urban growth.
|
Facilitating urbanization and increasing interactions between rural and urban areas, rather than trying to prevent or ignore it, can stimulate rural and urban development.
|
Worldwide, many lawmakers mistakenly focus on preventing rural-urban migration, believing this to be the main cause of city growth, according to the report. A better approach to slow urban growth -- and buy time to prepare for the expansion of urban populations -- would be to focus on lowering unwanted fertility, says UNFPA.
Empowering women and ensuring better access to health services could help achieve this goal, the UN agency says.
Additionally, it warns against measures that try to curb urbanization, as these can make both urban and rural poverty worse because they attempt to contravene economic realities.
"Workers need the opportunities cities offer, and cities need workers," the UNFPA report states, adding that millions of migrants move to cities each year because they intuitively perceive the advantages of urban life.
"Facilitating urbanization and increasing interactions between rural and urban areas, rather than trying to prevent or ignore it, can stimulate rural and urban development," UNFPA says.
Overall, urbanization has the potential to be a positive force economically, socially, and environmentally, the report's lead author Martine said last week.
"The vast urban expansion in developing countries has global implications and requires a global response," he explained. "The train is in motion and together we have to make sure we are on the right track."
Contributed by Nicole Olsen, a writer for OneWorld US. Reprinted with permission from OneWorld US. OneWorld is an online hub for people who care about the world beyond their own borders.
To read another Global Envision article about urbanization, see Mixed Blessings of the Megacities.
Return to top


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Comments
I find it interesting that the UNFPA report suggested that a way to slow urban growth would be to focus on lowering fertility levels. I see the logic, but this idea ignores the fact that (as stated on pg. 22 of the UNFPA), fertility levels between women in urban areas are typically lower than rural areas and that "poverty might be a better indicator of fertility patterns than urban or rural residence (pg. 23 of the report). And knowing that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, we seem to be back at the proverbial drawing board. I do believe, though, that the essential take-away of the report—that urbanization can have a positive effect—is right on the mark. Before governments have a chance to respond with increased social services and infrastructure, urban dwellers will continue to rely on their fellow community members for support and an informal connection to needed services. Increased proximity may make it easier for service delivery from the government, but I be