Genetically Modified Farming on the Rise in Developing Nations

From the Archives

Previously filed under: Asia, Agriculture
A recent report found that over 90 percent of those growing GM crops worldwide were small, resource-poor farmers in developing countries.
Photo Credit: SciDev.Net
Barley that has been genetically modified to resist the yellow dwarf virus.
Farmers in the developing world are increasingly turning to genetically modified (GM) crops, with planting up 21 percent in 2006 according to a new report.

Researchers at the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) say over 90 percent of those growing GM crops worldwide — around 9.3 million farmers — are small, resource-poor farmers in developing countries.

The authors say the rise in GM crop planting indicates a growing acceptance of them, but anti-GM organisations disagree. The report launched last week (18 January) says the total area of approved GM crops in 2006 was 102 million hectares in 22 countries — a 13 percent rise on the previous year.



About 40 percent of GM crops were grown in developing countries, which showed the biggest rise in growing area — 21 percent compared to nine percent in industrialised countries.
About 40 percent of GM crops were grown in developing countries, with a 21 percent increase in growing area, compared to nine percent in industrialised countries.


India had the largest proportional increase: 192 percent, an increase from 1.3 million hectares in 2005 to 3.8 million hectares in 2006. South Africa was second with an increase of 180 percent from 0.5 million hectares in 2005 to 1.4 million hectares in 2006.

The United States, followed by Argentina, Brazil, Canada, India and China were the six main adopters of GM crops.

According to its website, the ISAAA sees the high adoption rate of GM as "testimony to the trust and confidence of millions of small and large farmers in crop biotechnology in both industrial and developing countries".

However, both Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth published reports disagreeing with ISAAA's positive verdict.

Greenpeace says ISAAA's claims about GM's acceptance are "not consistent with the massive and continuing opposition from consumers, farmers, local and regional authorities, national governments and even major food companies".

Nnimmo Bassey of Friends of the Earth Africa told SciDev.Net, "No GM crop on the market today offers benefits to the consumer in terms of quality or price, and to date these crops have done nothing to alleviate hunger or poverty in Africa or elsewhere".




Contributed by Luisa Massarani, a journalist with a PhD in the scientific information distribution area. Reprinted with permission from SciDev.Net.

To read another Global Envision article about Genetically Modified agriculture, see Asia Holds the Key to the Future of Genetically Modified Food.



Return to top

Stories We're Watching

Biofuels goals 'may lead to food shortages'

Science and Development Network - Mon, 05/21/2012 - 02:00
A study finds that some developing countries may face significant food security impacts by 2020 if their ambitious biofuels targets are met.

Land grabbers: Africa's hidden revolution

The Guardian's Poverty Matters - Sat, 05/19/2012 - 16:05
Vast swaths of Africa are being bought up by oligarchs, sheikhs and agribusiness corporations. But, as this extract from The Land Grabbers explains, centuries of history are being destroyed.

Sustainable development is the only way forward

The Guardian's Poverty Matters - Sun, 05/20/2012 - 23:00
Development co-operation needs to shift focus from poverty eradication to a broader, more inclusive framework.

The Real Story on Charcoal for African Cookstoves

Triple Pundit - Sun, 05/20/2012 - 13:11
You may have seen pictures of women in Africa cooking their daily meals on a small cookstove. These cooking implements look remarkably similar to the portable charcoal grills an American family might bring to the beach for an afternoon of grilling hot dogs and hamburgers.

Could Glass-Steagall Have Stopped JPMorgan Loss?

NPR - Sat, 05/19/2012 - 15:13
The banking giant's $2 billion loss has many lawmakers and economists wondering what happened to the 2010 financial overhaul, which was supposed to prevent risky hedging. Many are also looking back further — to a Depression-era law, repealed in 1999, that separated commercial and investment bank activities.

Recent comments

Countries

An initiative of Mercy Corps
“You must be the change
you wish to see in the world”
Mahatma Gandhi
Learn more about Mercy Corps >

Efficiency

Over the last five years, more than 89% of Mercy Corps' resources have been allocated directly to programs

Excellence

America's premier charity evaluator gives Mercy Corps four stars in organizational efficiency. Click here to learn more.

High Value

Every dollar you donate to Mercy Corps helps us secure $11.16 in donated food and other critical supplies.

Mercy Corps — Dept. W — 45 SW Ankeny — Portland, OR 97204
All original content Copyright © 2009 Mercy Corps. Quoted and linked content is property of the creator(s). Mercy Corps will not sell, rent or trade your personal information.