Two Koreas, One Economy?
From the Archives
Posted on August 20, 2007
|
| This North Korean woman could soon be working in a united Korean economy. Photo Credit: Cassandra Nelson/Mercy Corps |
Ahead of the summit, details emerged of a plan to pump millions of dollars of South Korean capital into North Korea's crumbling infrastructure. Officials in Seoul say they will unveil a plan for injecting "social overhead capital" 4, which means funds will target social infrastructure like schools and hospitals, rather than focusing on more direct aid like rice and fertilizer provisions. It remains unclear precisely what the scale of this investment will be, but a UPI news analysis goes so far as to call the summit a likely "bonanza" for Pyongyang 5. The economic focus of the meetings highlights incremental shifts underway in a nation long known for maintaining rigid central command of its economy. This Backgrounder 6notes the North Korean government has gradually lightened its restrictions on "small-scale trade and barter" operations as a spiraling, decades-long economic crisis has made these activities increasingly common, despite government clampdown attempts.
|
The August 28-30, 2007 summit between North and South Korea will be the second summit between the countries since 1953, when the Korean War's frontline froze into a bitter cold border.
|
These inklings of openness, taken alongside high hopes for this August's summit, make for a promising spectacle. But the Economist warns against buying too firmly into the hype, saying the summit may represent "another false dawn" 10 in a diplomatic history smattered with letdowns. In a separate article, the paper notes that Kim may have cynical, non-economic reasons 11 for hosting the summit—namely to bolster South Korea's President Roh Moo-hyun, a relatively gentle political counterpart Kim may be eager to keep in power; and also to sow seeds of discord among North Korea's negotiating partners in the Six-Party Talks 12 on nuclear disarmament. The Korea Times notes that Seoul and Washington are already bickering over the summit's agenda 13. Furthermore, even if Pyongyang makes baby-steps toward economic liberalization, there's a long road ahead—the Heritage Foundation's Index of Economic Freedom 14 still ranks North Korea 157th out of 157 countries analyzed.
Footnotes:
1 Koreas to Hold Summit in Pyongyang, The Korea Times
2 Crisis Guide: The Korean Peninsula, CFR.org
3 U.S. Wants Seoul to Push on Nuclear Issue, but Pyongyang Unlikely to Respond: U.S. Observer, Yonhap News Agency
4 Seoul to Unveil Investment Plan in NK Infrastructure, The Korea Times
5 Analysis: Summit bonanza for North Korea, UPI Asia Online
6 Backgrounder: North Korea's Capitalist Experiment, CFR.org
7 World's Riskiest Market: Investors are growing more cautious, but an intrepid few still bet on North Korea, Newsweek International
8 Orascom takes stake in N Korea's Sangwon, Financial Times
9 North Korea to Let Capitalism Loose in Investment Zone, New York Times
10 Another False Dawn? The Economist
11 Mr. Kim Has the Neighbors In, The Economist
12 Backgrounder: The Six-Party Talks on North Korea's Nuclear Program, CFR.org
13 Seoul, Washington D.C. Differ on Summit Agenda, The Korea Times
14 2007 Index of Economic Freedom, North Korea, The Heritage Foundation
Contributed by Lee Hudson Teslik, Assistant Editor of CFR.org. From CFR.org. Reprinted with permission. For more analysis on foreign policy and international relations, go to www.cfr.org.
To read another Global Envision article about Korea's economy, see A Defining Moment for US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement.
Return to top


Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Recent comments