The green image of hydropower may have been seriously overstated, warn scientists.

Hydropower plants have long been a byword for clean energy. But researchers warn that tropical reservoirs might release more greenhouse gases than fossil-fuel power stations.

Philip Fearnside, a conservation biologist at the National Institute for Research in the Amazon in Manaus, Brazil, has shown that in the first ten years of operation, a typical reservoir will emit four times as much carbon as a fossil-fuel station.

The culprit is organic matter trapped when land is flooded to create a dam. As this decays, it releases significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane.

It is a topic of vigorous debate, fuelled by a lack of data for tropical dams and the implications for energy strategies in developing countries, reports Jim Giles.

Philip Fearnside has shown that in the first ten years of operation, a typical reservoir will emit four times as much carbon as a fossil-fuel station.

It calls into question the wisdom of promoting dam construction in developing countries, including a US$5 billion project proposed for the Congo river. Another concern is the funding of hydropower projects through the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism.

These concerns are likely to influence discussions of greenhouse gas emissions at a UNESCO meeting in Paris, France, next week (5-6 December) as well as future analyses by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Link to full article in Nature




Contributed by Nature, an international journal, published weekly, with research spanning all of the scientific disciplines. Reprinted with permission from SciDev.Net.

To read another Global Envision article about hydropower, see Global Warming Cures: Time to Harvest Ocean Power?



Return to top